Experimental Group Based Studyof Topical Oil Treatment – Niavin

Author Dr. Dirk Wiedbrauck, Gran Canaria, Spain

Niavin is a clinically proven pain reliever that takes traditional oral and topical pain relief formulas a step forward by working synergistically with the body to deactivate active, pain-causing trigger points. Most people can find these trigger points by feeling for the tender spots in the neck, below the collarbone, upper chest, in front and behind the armpit, and in the ribs below the armpit. Niavin provides relief by releasing painful trigger points and delivering potent, long lasting relief from arthritis, joint pains, muscle strains and everyday aches and pains, while providing strong anti-inflammatory effects in the affected areas.

 

Introduction

Pain reducing medications such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and COX-2 inhibitors have been common treatments for osteoarthritis in the growing elderly population. However, these medications often have painful side effects or do not react well with other medications. Accordingly, there is a need for alternative treatments for the osteoarthritis patient.

Today, patients have a variety of treatment options for managing their pain. Topical pain relief products are not only gaining in popularity, but medical science is discovering innovative ways to broaden their use. Scientists from the University of Strathclyde and University of Glasgow stated (1),

 

Advantages

  • Oil base makes application easy and controllable.
  • Onset of symptom relief is faster than oral preparations (3-8).
  • Symptoms are alleviated at a steady rate and relief may last longer (3-8).
  • Drugs delivered topically may need to be applied less frequently and in smaller amounts (3-8).
  • Formulations diffuse through the skin and enter into the bloodstream, thereby initially bypassing the liver, stomach, and digestive system (called ‘first pass’). Many systemic (whole body) side effects, such as irritated stomach lining, may be diminished or eliminated.
  • Studies have shown that when formulations are delivered topically – as much as 95% reach the target cells (e.g. muscle). Results from oral preparations delivered to a targeted site of pain are less than 5% (2).Topical application of drugs directly to pathological sites offers potential advantages over systemic delivery by producing high drug concentration in the affected tissue while avoiding unwanted side effects due to high systemic drug levels. Topical preparations of NSAIDs are commonly used as analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents to treat various disorders such as arthropathies and myalgias. Many topical formulations employ chemical penetration enhancers to improve dermal penetration of drugs. Chemical enhancers, which are usually organic solvents, may cause skin irritation and sensitization. An advantage of NIAVIN is that it is composed of natural lipids and oils designed to minimize irritation.

Objectives

To study pain management with topical oil treatment (NIAVIN) in an outpatient rehabilitation center for 8 weeks.

Study Design – Double blind randomized trial

Randomized selected patients from a holistic orientated outpatient clinic for rehabilitation, specialized in chronic pain relief. (Primarily: Physiotherapy, Osteopathy, Acupuncture, Electrotherapy, Neural Therapy, Carbon Dioxide Therapy and Chiropractics.) The study consisted of a block of 8 weeks. Subjects were reassessed after one, two, four, six and eight weeks. The assessments were done consistently by the same study consultant, including goniometer measurements, pain questionnaire evaluation and treatment response with the Lanier Scale.

Numeric Pain Assessment Scale

On a scale of 0 to 10 (0=no pain, 10=most pain), my pain is:

0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10

Response to treatment with the Lanier Scale

  1. markedly worse
  2. moderately worse
  3. mildly worse
  4. no change
  5. mildly better
  6. moderately better
  7. markedly better

Treatment

Topical NIAVIN oils were supplied to the test group and placebo oil to the control group, who were instructed by a blinded consultant (nurse) as to appropriate use. Instructions included applications three times a day on the pain region and surrounding trigger points. Placebo oils, identical in smell and appearance to the active oils were supplied to the control group. If subjects encountered any side effects while using the product, they were instructed to notify the study personal immediately.

 

Range of Motion Measurement

Joint flexibility is defined as the range of motion (ROM) allowed at a joint. A joint’s ROM is usually measured by the number of degrees from the starting position of a segment to its position at the end of its full range of the movement. The most common way this is done is by using a double-armed goniometer.

Goniometer

Assessment of a trigger points (TPs)

Trigger Points are assessed primarily by palpation with the fingers, although Electro-myographical (EMG) studies and Thermography also are valid procedures for locating them since altered nerve signals and increased temperature can be detected with some trigger points. While the art of palpation is important for locating more specialized or subtle trigger points, anybody can stick their own fingers into their sore muscle and feel around for a trigger point

 

How to find your own trigger points

Make sure the patient and the affected muscle are completely relaxed, not on stretch. One of the following techniques can be used to palpate the trigger point:

Flat Palpation involves simply moving the fingertip(s) transversely across the muscles fibers with some pressure until a ‘taut band’ is located. Having found this tight section of the muscle, explore along its length to locate the spot of maximum tenderness with minimum pressure: that is the trigger point. With some practice it doesn’t take long to find the taut bands in a muscle.

 

Results

Of the initially 124 participants assessed, all participants completed the necessary post treatment and finished the evaluation completely. Over the eight weeks, 62 participants used substance NIAVIN and 62 used placebo treatment.

 

Methodology

The study consisted of a block of 8 weeks. Subjects were reassessed after one, two, four, six and eight weeks. The assessments were done consistently by the same study consultant, including goniometer measurements, pain questionnaire evaluation and treatment response with the Lanier Scale.

 

Demographics

The study included 38 men (61.3%) and 24 women (38.7%) in the placebo group. The treatment group included 41 men (66.1%) and 21 women (33.9%).

 

Diagnosis

The diagnosis in the treatment group was twelve patients having epicondylitis (19.2%), fourteen experiencing finger polyarthritis (22.6%), twenty test results were obtained for patients with knee arthritis (32.5%) and sixteen measurements were taken with patients diagnosed with Achilles tendon pain (25.7%).

The diagnosis in the placebo Group was twelve patients having epicondylitis (19.2%), fourteen experiencing finger polyarthritis (22.6%), twenty test results were obtained for patients with knee arthritis (32.5%) and sixteen measurements were taken with patients diagnosed with Achilles tendon pain (25.7%).

 

Treatment

Topical NIAVIN oils were supplied to the test group and placebo oil to the control group, who were instructed by a blinded consultant (nurse) as to appropriate use. Instructions included applications three times a day on the pain region and surrounding trigger points. Placebo oils, identical in smell and appearance to the active oils were supplied to the control group. In both groups no adverse reactions were reported.

 

Results

The results of the study were based on the response of the treatment with the Lanier scale and the range of movement measurement (ROM), after eight weeks.After the first week 54 patients reported no change of symptoms in the placebo group (87.2%), 4 patients felt worse (6.4%), 4 patients felt mildly better (6.4%).

In the treatment group 9 patients reported no change of symptoms (14.5%), 2 patients felt worse (3.2%), 11 patients were mildly better (17.7%) and 41 patients were moderately better (66.2%).

After eight weeks 42 patients reported no change of symptoms in the placebo group (67%), 3 patients felt worse (4.8%), 4 patients were mildly better (6.4%), 7 patients were moderately better (11.2%) and 6 patients were markedly better (9.6%).In the treatment group 4 patients reported no change of symptoms after eight weeks (6.4%), 2 patients were worse (3.2%), 6 patients were mildly better (9.6%), 4 patients were moderately better (6.4%) and 46 patients were markedly better (74.4%).

Five post functional testing sessions were taken for all four groups, after one, two, four and six weeks. Across the four groups the test measurement revealed that the use of topical oil, applied to the trigger points in a range of three centimeters of the affected joint produced significant improvements in pain relief, range of motion, physical performance and plantar/dorsal flexion in the achilles tendon pain group.

74.4% of the treatment group were markedly better after eight weeks of treatment and only 6.4% in the placebo group were markedly better.

 

Conclusion

The study clearly pointed out the effectiveness of Niavin topical oil in the treatment of epicondylitis, knee arthritis, finger arthritis and achilles tendon pain.Click to Download Full Length Study in Adobe PDF Format (165kb) or read it online here.

Click to Download Full Length Study in Adobe PDF Format (165kb) or read it online here.